Home | Tutorials | Wiki | Issues
Ask Your Question

Reference paper for gazebo [closed]

asked 2013-06-17 09:07:50 -0500

SL Remy gravatar image

updated 2013-06-18 07:41:48 -0500

Is Design and use paradigms for gazebo, an open-source multi-robot simulator (N Koenig, A Howard - Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2004) still the canonical reference for Gazebo?

edit retag flag offensive reopen merge delete

Closed for the following reason the question is answered, right answer was accepted by SL Remy
close date 2015-12-17 07:23:51.941066


Not really canonical, but quite a recent one from ICRA'13 - N. Koenig and J. Hsu, “The many faces of simulation: Use cases for a general purpose simulator,” in ICRA’13 Workshop on Developments of Simulation Tools for Robotics & Biomechanics, 2013. Not sure will it be available online at any point since workshop papers tend to be not included to indices like IEEEXplore. May be Nate or John will upload it later.

Boris gravatar imageBoris ( 2013-06-17 20:41:21 -0500 )edit

P.S. The link you have provided is broken, looks like a missed `http://`.

Boris gravatar imageBoris ( 2013-06-17 20:45:46 -0500 )edit

sorry about that, corrected.

SL Remy gravatar imageSL Remy ( 2013-06-18 07:43:51 -0500 )edit

1 Answer

Sort by » oldest newest most voted

answered 2013-06-18 00:07:59 -0500

scpeters gravatar image

The 2004 IROS paper is the right one. They didn't write a paper for the ICRA'13 workshop; just an abstract and then the talk.

edit flag offensive delete link more


Apparently they did write something for ICRA :) You can find it on the conference's CD/USB titled "ICRA'13 Workshops and Tutorials Proceedings". Although it has only 2 pages, there are title, abstract, 5 sections and references. So looks like a paper to me. Again I am not clear about its official status, i.e. can it be treated as a publication.

Boris gravatar imageBoris ( 2013-06-18 04:43:51 -0500 )edit

I asked Nate, and he said they submitted a 2 page abstract for the ICRA workshop. He also said that the 2004 IROS paper is the right one to reference.

scpeters gravatar imagescpeters ( 2013-06-18 11:39:16 -0500 )edit

Thanks for clarifying!

Boris gravatar imageBoris ( 2013-06-19 00:04:17 -0500 )edit

Any news on this? Unfortunately, 2004 paper is bit out of date...

ZdenekM gravatar imageZdenekM ( 2014-01-29 10:05:19 -0500 )edit

Question Tools



Asked: 2013-06-17 09:07:50 -0500

Seen: 7,168 times

Last updated: Jun 18 '13