gazebo6 sensor contact
I have a problem since I changed from gazebo2 to gazebo6
I have in my URDF this:
<gazebo reference="left_foot_link">
<sensor name="left_foot_sensor" type="contact">
<always_on>true</always_on>
<update_rate>100.0</update_rate>
<contact>
<collision>left_foot_fsr1_link_collision</collision>
<collision>left_foot_fsr2_link_collision</collision>
<collision>left_foot_fsr3_link_collision</collision>
<collision>left_foot_fsr4_link_collision</collision>
<topic>/robot/left_foot_sensor</topic>
</contact>
</sensor>
</gazebo>
The links fsr1, fsr2, fsr3, fsr4 are fixed to the parent. Using gz topic I can see the two topics:
- /gazebo/default/robot/left_foot_link/left_foot_sensor/contacts
- /robot/left_foot_sensor
But messages in both of this topics are empty (only timestamp). While in the topic /gazebo/default/physics/contacts, I can see:
contact {
collision1: "robot::left_foot_link::left_foot_link_lump::left_foot_fsr1_link_collision_1"
collision2: "ground_plane::link::collision"
position {
x: 0.038235972692059896
y: 0.016852892204142138
z: -8.2373648911671e-05
}
...
EDIT
I found that because the sdf parser, the basename for grouped links includes a "_lump" postfix (see https://bitbucket.org/osrf/sdformat/p... for details). I managed to get the contacts working by setting explicitly the collision name in the sensor like is shown below. The parent link is called "left_foot_link", the child links "left_foot_fsr1_link", ..., "left_foot_fsr4_link".
<gazebo reference="left_foot_link">
<sensor name="left_foot_sensor" type="contact">
<always_on>true</always_on>
<update_rate>100.0</update_rate>
<contact>
<collision>left_foot_link_lump::left_foot_fsr1_link_collision_1</collision>
<collision>left_foot_link_lump::left_foot_fsr2_link_collision_2</collision>
<collision>left_foot_link_lump::left_foot_fsr3_link_collision_3</collision>
<collision>left_foot_link_lump::left_foot_fsr4_link_collision_4</collision>
<topic>/robot/left_foot_sensor</topic>
</contact>
</sensor>
</gazebo>
I couldn't understand why the postfix _1 _2 _3 _4 are attached to the child links. Anyone would suggest a better way to remove the hard-coded prefix/postfix in the names? In which version the pull request #235 will be reflected?
Thanks!
I had the same problem but not with the same postfix. Thanks you for this post.