2017-01-27 03:53:54 -0500 | received badge | ● Taxonomist |
2013-05-03 21:53:37 -0500 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2013-04-09 12:04:50 -0500 | commented question | BDI walking does not work in my PC. If you reset the world/model pose, and then run 5steps.py again, it works (for me at least). Not that this is all that helpful, but if you just needed to collect some data... |
2013-04-09 12:00:43 -0500 | commented question | DRC Vehicle dimensions I can't answer all your questions but can offer two helpful points. If you set the handbrake value to 0.1, it can get the car moving. This is probably a plugin error where they check for >0.0; so setting it to open doesn't work. Also, there are no side rails in the collision geometry; the Atlas robot cannot collide with it (also no overhead rails, for that matter), so it cannot impede your movement. |
2013-03-14 04:45:29 -0500 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2013-02-16 10:17:39 -0500 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2013-02-16 10:17:39 -0500 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2013-02-16 10:17:39 -0500 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2013-02-11 14:34:32 -0500 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2013-02-11 14:34:32 -0500 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2013-02-11 14:34:32 -0500 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2013-02-08 18:10:44 -0500 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2013-02-06 12:38:59 -0500 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2013-02-05 20:18:11 -0500 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2013-02-05 20:18:11 -0500 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2013-02-05 15:13:38 -0500 | asked a question | DRC Laser / Stereo Disparity between Collision and Visual Elements It is fantastic to have DRCSIM 2.0 and Gazebo 1.4, thanks! Obviously a huge part of the DRC competition is rectifying data between stereo and laser, but these produce differing results. Robots can only interact with collision boundaries based on objects; if it can't collide it can't affect. The disparity is that the /multisensesl/camera/points2 data produces point clouds based on visual elements, while /multisensesl/laser/scan produces point clouds based on collision boundaries. Visual data is not useful if it doesn't lead to a means of interaction. |
2013-01-22 17:36:53 -0500 | received badge | ● Supporter (source) |
2013-01-18 12:23:23 -0500 | received badge | ● Good Question (source) |
2013-01-17 13:26:33 -0500 | commented answer | Heightmap with Gazebo 1.3 However, if i run atlasutils drcsimv0.launch, the terrain map loads correctly. this terrain map i cannot delete (it should just be another model, right?) and I get the "no mesh specified" error if I try to load the terrain heightmap again. |
2013-01-17 13:12:50 -0500 | commented answer | Heightmap with Gazebo 1.3 I'm also getting this problem, even with the DRCterrain. I will run atlasutils atlas.launch, and try to import the drc_terrain model to get this problem. Custom heightmaps similarly will not work. |
2013-01-16 15:43:05 -0500 | received badge | ● Nice Question (source) |
2013-01-15 15:15:48 -0500 | asked a question | Poor Stereo Output The following link is some captured point cloud data visualized in Rviz following the DRCSIM tutorials. The robot is in the golf cart, set to drive in a circle, with a box placed nearby to try and "see". http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lM2UZ-6tRaQ In the video, the multisense output produces a huge amount of spurious point cloud data. My guess is that it is the approximately synced cameras: when the multisense head moves around any amount, the Is this the general experience with the multisense head so far? |
2013-01-14 12:27:13 -0500 | commented question | Model SDF parsing error Warning [parser.cc:377] SDF has no <sdf> element in file[/usr/share/drcsim-1.3/models/atlas/model.urdf] Error: SDF parsing the xml failed hum... that's interesting. Is the urdf parsing binary your code links to possibly corrupted? I've purged all of ros as well before re-installing... |
2013-01-11 18:34:56 -0500 | commented answer | Model SDF parsing error The outputs to env are posted above in the initial post. This is after a vigorous scrubbing of all things ros, gazebo, and drcsim on my workstation. If there's no other idea for a solution, I'll just fall back on re-installing 12.04 to continue work. |
2013-01-11 17:17:38 -0500 | commented answer | Model SDF parsing error Your suggestion is appreciated. I've since run apt-get purge on every ros-fuerte-* package as well as gazebo and drcsim, apt-get clean, apt-get autoclean, apt-get update, and then finally apt-get install drcsim to reinstall. The same error persists. |
2013-01-11 12:29:44 -0500 | commented question | Model SDF parsing error yes, after uninstalling, I reloaded the URLs, did an apt-get update, and reinstalled. The model.urdf at the url is idential to the one under /drcsim-1.3/model, and even urdf files newly generated through xacro have the same parsing error. Is there more debug info I can provide? |
2013-01-10 17:47:41 -0500 | asked a question | Model SDF parsing error After working with gazebo/drcsim all day yesterday with only the occasional crash/freeze, I started up my projects today to find that the atlas model.urdf will not load. If I were to run: I get the following Errors: And gazebo/drcsim exits cleanly. This similarly happens if the Atlas model is loaded from the Gazebo gui (with roscore running as well). The solutions I've tried:
Any assistance to get gazebo up and running would be very appreciated. EDIT: env | grep GAZEBO: env | grep ROS: |
2012-12-14 19:03:46 -0500 | asked a question | Subscription to /scan throws MultiRayShape exception I'm trying to collect sensor data from the DRC robot in Gazebo (fresh Ubuntu 12.04 install, DRCSIM 1.1, and Gazebo 1.3.1), and following the visualization tutorial for DRC, or creating a laser assembler node both throw the same error: Exception [MultiRayShape.cc:113] index[0] out of range[0-18446744073706480025] Is there a suggested way around this bug, or might there be a better place to submit a bug report? This did not occur on <1.3 versions of gazebo... |
2012-12-12 03:30:17 -0500 | received badge | ● Student (source) |
2012-12-11 16:46:49 -0500 | received badge | ● Editor (source) |
2012-12-11 16:45:42 -0500 | asked a question | Gazebo 1.3 plugin + ROS incompatibility? After writing some code to pull LIDAR data and induce simple movement control for gazebo-1.2, the update rendered these problematic. I've re-installed gazebo, drcsim, ros-fuerte, and the boost 1.46 libraries in an attempt to find the problem, but I can still deterministically crash gazebo1.3 by following these steps: Pressing a movement key exits gazebo without any thrown errors. Attaching to the laserScan publisher in Rviz induces an exit with the following error as well: Exception [MultiRayShape.cc:113] index[0] out of range[0-8742677509569] Running roswtf gives the following output, but everything seems to be functional and happy in rxgraph. If anyone has a better idea than me with regards to what might be the problems in communications between ros and Gazebo, or what I could do to find out the problems, I would appreciate them very much. |