2023-06-25 14:29:46 -0500 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2023-04-16 21:30:43 -0500 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2023-02-20 06:55:41 -0500 | answered a question | Is there any sleep function in gazebo ? This is late but for anyone searching: gazebo::common::Time::MSleep(unsigned int miliseconds); However, this seems to |
2023-02-17 04:32:53 -0500 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2023-02-17 04:32:53 -0500 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2023-02-17 04:32:53 -0500 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2023-02-09 03:02:08 -0500 | asked a question | Check Debug Mode (true/false) in C++ Check Debug Mode (true/false) in C++ Is there a straightforward way to check if debug is set to true within C++ code? e. |
2023-02-09 02:59:03 -0500 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2023-02-09 02:57:34 -0500 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2023-02-09 02:57:34 -0500 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2023-02-06 01:37:52 -0500 | received badge | ● Enthusiast |
2023-01-30 03:58:56 -0500 | commented question | Gazebo Fortress Contact Sensor disable collision SDF Spec <collide_without_contact> Element Required: 0 Type: bool Default: false Description: Flag to disable con |
2023-01-30 03:57:33 -0500 | commented question | Gazebo Fortress Contact Sensor disable collision SDF Spec <collide_without_contact> Element Required: 0 Type: bool Default: false Description: Flag to disable con |
2023-01-30 03:57:09 -0500 | commented question | Gazebo Fortress Contact Sensor disable collision link text <collide_without_contact> Element Required: 0 Type: bool Default: false Description: Flag to disable co |
2023-01-30 03:56:50 -0500 | commented question | Gazebo Fortress Contact Sensor disable collision link text <collide_without_contact> Element Required: 0 Type: bool Default: false Description: Flag to disable c |
2023-01-30 03:56:34 -0500 | commented question | Gazebo Fortress Contact Sensor disable collision link text <collide_without_contact> Element Required: 0 Type: bool Default: false Description: Flag to disable c |
2023-01-30 03:56:10 -0500 | commented question | Gazebo Fortress Contact Sensor disable collision link text <collide_without_contact> Element Required: 0 Type: bool Default: false Description: Flag to disable c |
2023-01-30 03:55:49 -0500 | commented question | Gazebo Fortress Contact Sensor disable collision link text </n> <collide_without_contact> Element Required: 0 Type: bool Default: false Description: Flag to |
2023-01-30 03:55:20 -0500 | commented question | Gazebo Fortress Contact Sensor disable collision link text <collide_without_contact> Element Required: 0 Type: bool Default: false Description: Flag to disable co |
2023-01-30 03:54:51 -0500 | commented question | Gazebo Fortress Contact Sensor disable collision link text <collide_without_contact> Element Required: 0 Type: bool Default: false Description: Flag to disable co |
2023-01-29 02:09:08 -0500 | asked a question | Spawning (& Destroying) many small objects efficiently Spawning (& Destroying) many small objects efficiently A quick question about the physics engine: If I wanted to con |
2023-01-29 02:04:57 -0500 | edited answer | Gazebo Fortress Contact Sensor disable collision If it fits your simulation, you could consider attaching the contact sensor to an essentially flat collision element jus |
2023-01-29 02:00:50 -0500 | answered a question | Gazebo Fortress Contact Sensor disable collision If it fits your simulation, you could consider attaching the contact sensor to an essentially flat collision element jus |
2023-01-01 05:43:49 -0500 | answered a question | Inconsistent contact behaviour on similar surfaces If you are not getting enough information from your contact sensors, maybe you could try increasing the max_contacts par |
2022-12-15 13:31:31 -0500 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2022-12-12 08:48:01 -0500 | commented question | Errors in the source code of the Gazebo plugin developer tutorial Maybe this is a vscode issue... but I tried the hello-world example and even though I had the same errors, it compiled w |
2022-12-12 07:04:35 -0500 | edited question | Errors in the source code of the Gazebo plugin developer tutorial Errors in the source code of the Gazebo plugin developer tutorial I am following the tutorial for compiling a custom Gaz |
2022-12-12 07:02:45 -0500 | received badge | ● Organizer (source) |
2022-12-12 07:01:36 -0500 | edited question | Errors in the source code of the Gazebo plugin developer tutorial Errors in the source code of the Gazebo plugin developer tutorial I am following the tutorial for compiling a custom Gaz |
2022-12-12 07:00:21 -0500 | received badge | ● Editor (source) |
2022-12-12 07:00:21 -0500 | edited question | Errors in the source code of the Gazebo plugin developer tutorial Errors in the source code of the Gazebo plugin developer tutorial I am following the tutorial for compiling a custom Gaz |
2022-12-12 06:59:55 -0500 | asked a question | Errors in the source code of the Gazebo plugin developer tutorial Errors in the source code of the Gazebo plugin developer tutorial I am following the tutorial for compiling a custom Gaz |
2022-12-11 00:39:55 -0500 | received badge | ● Supporter (source) |
2022-12-11 00:39:17 -0500 | commented answer | Removing collisions from a link using parameter passing Correct. Where is the documentation connecting ROS, Gazebo, SDFormat version number and libsdformat version number? I co |
2022-12-11 00:38:39 -0500 | commented answer | Removing collisions from a link using parameter passing Correct. Where is the documentation connecting ROS,Gazebo,SDFormat version and libsdformat version numbers? I couldn't f |
2022-12-11 00:36:39 -0500 | marked best answer | Removing collisions from a link using parameter passing I am trying to load some static models into a world. I would like them to not cause any collisions, so I am trying to remove them using the tutorial here: http://sdformat.org/tutorials?tut=par... Has this been implemented in sdf 1.7 and the Gazebo release for ROS Noetic? The models are showing up with the collision elements present. I am running the latest release of ROS Noetic on Ubuntu 20.04.5 My code is attached.C:\fakepath\test.world Thanks! |
2022-12-11 00:36:39 -0500 | received badge | ● Scholar (source) |
2022-12-11 00:27:07 -0500 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2022-12-08 14:59:57 -0500 | commented question | make a moving/rotating platform for driving a robot Your inertial numbers seem very extreme - where did you get those values? |
2022-12-08 14:59:55 -0500 | asked a question | Removing collisions from a link using parameter passing Removing collisions from a link using parameter passing I am trying to load some static models into a world. I would lik |