2020-07-14 11:49:03 -0500 | received badge | ● Taxonomist |
2016-07-18 09:26:45 -0500 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2016-07-06 12:25:41 -0500 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2016-07-05 10:59:49 -0500 | received badge | ● Student (source) |
2016-07-05 10:58:38 -0500 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2016-07-04 14:59:41 -0500 | received badge | ● Editor (source) |
2016-07-04 14:58:51 -0500 | asked a question | Bug in SphericalCoordinates::SphericalFromLocal? I was under the impression that gazebo assumed an East, North, Up (ENU) right-handed frame for the SphericalCoordinate class, but I think there's a bug in the conversion for lat-long. Test code: with results: The returned latitude and longitude should be positive if we're operating in an ENU coordinate system (assuming 0 deg heading offset, as is the case above). Is this the intended behavior, or is this a bug? I believe the offending negation is here. |
2016-06-13 18:53:24 -0500 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2016-06-08 09:03:41 -0500 | commented answer | Native spherical (WGS84) coordinates? Thank you. |
2016-06-07 14:56:01 -0500 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2016-06-07 14:30:01 -0500 | received badge | ● Supporter (source) |
2016-06-07 14:29:59 -0500 | received badge | ● Scholar (source) |
2016-06-07 13:52:34 -0500 | commented answer | Native spherical (WGS84) coordinates? Thanks @nkoenig. So if I understand correctly, underlying cord sys is still XYZ, but Spherical Coord. class implements proper WGS84<-->local XYZ (via intermediate ECEF frame), with local XYZ origin at the lat/long specified in world file (as defined here: http://sdformat.org/spec?ver=1.6&elem=world#world_spherical_coordinates). Local XYZ is in an ENU orientation. Does this sound correct? |
2016-06-07 11:45:57 -0500 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2016-06-07 09:48:06 -0500 | asked a question | Native spherical (WGS84) coordinates? Hello all, I'm looking to build a simulation where I can accurately bookkeep my robots position in geodetic coordinates (WGS84 datum). Unfortunately the ROS+Gazebo+Hector GPS plugin route isn't likely to work, exactly because I'm trying to simulate vehicles at high latitude (near the poles), and traveling large distances O(10 km). Is it possible for Gazebo to run a simulation natively in spherical coordinates? I haven't been able to find any resources to date on this. If not, have any others found themselves in a similar situation? Outside of writing a dynamical model in MATLAB or similar, have others found an acceptable solution? |