2019-01-16 21:30:45 -0600 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2019-01-16 21:30:45 -0600 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2017-11-08 16:50:11 -0600 | commented answer | (Solved) How can i solved: Deprecated syntax, please prepend 'hardware_interface/' ? And this is the error I get Could not find resource 'waist' in 'hardware_interface::EffortJointInterface'.. I can't figu |
2017-11-08 16:49:36 -0600 | commented answer | (Solved) How can i solved: Deprecated syntax, please prepend 'hardware_interface/' ? And this is the error I get Could not find resource 'waist' in 'hardware_interface::EffortJointInterface'. |
2017-11-08 16:48:54 -0600 | commented answer | (Solved) How can i solved: Deprecated syntax, please prepend 'hardware_interface/' ? I have a related issue. My transmission is set up as <transmission name="tran1"> <type>transmission_ |
2017-11-08 16:48:36 -0600 | commented answer | (Solved) How can i solved: Deprecated syntax, please prepend 'hardware_interface/' ? I have a related issue. My transmission is set up as <transmission name="tran1"> <type>transmissi |
2017-11-08 16:31:42 -0600 | commented question | Model spawning incorrectly in Gazebo despite looking good in Rviz Well, we're not entirely out of the gazebo realm. that's a resource related to the <transmission> tags in the urdf |
2017-11-08 15:29:07 -0600 | commented question | Model spawning incorrectly in Gazebo despite looking good in Rviz Nope. The model is fine now that I've fixed the inertia tensor. |
2017-11-08 14:01:24 -0600 | commented question | Model spawning incorrectly in Gazebo despite looking good in Rviz @chapulina, looks like I found the issue. There was some error when the model was created in solidworks and there wasn't |
2017-11-08 14:00:41 -0600 | commented question | Model spawning incorrectly in Gazebo despite looking good in Rviz @chapulina, looks like I found the issue. There was some error when the model was created in solidworks and there wasn't |
2017-11-08 13:21:08 -0600 | commented question | Model spawning incorrectly in Gazebo despite looking good in Rviz @chapulina, I did what you said and added one link at a time. The second to last link makes the model collapse. The last |
2017-11-08 13:20:44 -0600 | commented question | Model spawning incorrectly in Gazebo despite looking good in Rviz @chapulina, I did what you said and added one link at a time. The second to last link makes the model collapse. The last |
2017-11-08 12:38:30 -0600 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2017-11-05 21:17:08 -0600 | commented question | Model spawning incorrectly in Gazebo despite looking good in Rviz @chapulina, The robot looks fine before the simulation is started. I don't really see anything in verbose mode either. G |
2017-11-05 15:04:10 -0600 | asked a question | Model spawning incorrectly in Gazebo despite looking good in Rviz Model spawning incorrectly in Gazebo despite looking good in Rviz I am trying to import a custom robot into gazebo. I de |
2017-07-17 03:24:12 -0600 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2017-07-17 03:24:12 -0600 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2016-09-15 05:27:42 -0600 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2016-09-08 12:11:36 -0600 | asked a question | Help understanding what's going on with the forces on Atlas' foot. I'm recording the forces on Atlas' foot while walking normally. The forces in the beginning behave as expected However there's some crazy oscillation towards the end when both the feet are on the ground. I'd like to understand why that is happening. Thanks |
2016-09-05 21:03:20 -0600 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2016-08-28 04:36:52 -0600 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2016-08-28 04:36:52 -0600 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2016-08-15 10:51:02 -0600 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2016-08-12 10:46:09 -0600 | received badge | ● Enthusiast |
2016-08-11 15:23:06 -0600 | received badge | ● Editor (source) |
2016-08-11 15:21:16 -0600 | asked a question | Can't seem to add plugins to DRCsim models I'm trying to add a bumper plugin to the drcsim atlas model so I tracked down the
By my understanding this is supposed to create a topic called atlas_bumper but I don't see anything of that sort when I run Thanks |
2016-08-11 14:30:16 -0600 | asked a question | Where is the Atlas urdf file used by drcsim stored? I'm trying to add a bumper plugin to the atlas robot and so I'd like to find the URDF file. I run |
2016-08-01 11:31:43 -0600 | received badge | ● Student (source) |
2016-08-01 11:13:42 -0600 | asked a question | How to check which functions are being called? I'm trying to take a simple event in which the Atlas steps on the ground plane. I want to see which functions ODE calls and the functions ODE uses to determine the constraint forces. I'd like to see this happen while the simulation is running. Is there a way I could do that? I'd like to know what constraint equations and constraint forces ODE is using for that particular case. Thanks. |
2016-07-05 10:12:35 -0600 | received badge | ● Scholar (source) |
2016-07-05 10:12:32 -0600 | commented answer | How does ODE determine contact points in Gazebo? Thanks for that answer. The Atlas feet are indeed approximated as boxes however the STL file is already made up of triangles I don't know how I would refine it further and whether that refinement would stop gazebo from approximating it as a box. |
2016-07-04 07:03:28 -0600 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2016-06-28 03:26:21 -0600 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2016-06-25 14:01:48 -0600 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2016-06-22 14:47:13 -0600 | asked a question | How does ODE determine contact points in Gazebo? I was looking at the contact points for the Atlas in the DRCsim package. Each foot has 4 contact points at each vertex of the rectangle. I'd like to know how these points are determined. I've tried looking at the ODE code, but C++ isn't my strong suit so I had some difficulty figuring out what was going on. What I understand is that ODE compares the geometries one by one however it's not possible to compare all points so it only compare a select few points. What I'm trying to understand is what basis are those particular points selected? Why does the Atlas have the 4 contacts set up the way they are, and not some additional points on the heel? Can I add them myself? Thanks. |